When is it justified to use force according to self-defense laws?

Using force is justified in self-defense laws primarily when protecting oneself or others from imminent harm or danger. This principle is rooted in the idea that individuals have the right to defend themselves or others when confronted with a threat to safety, such as an assault or violent attack. The key focus here is on the necessity of the force being proportional to the immediate threat faced, ensuring that the response is not excessive.

In self-defense situations, the belief that harm is imminent is critical; it allows an individual to take reasonable and measured actions to safeguard themselves or another person. It acknowledges the basic human instinct to protect life and well-being.

The other options do not align with the legal standards for using force. For instance, protecting property may not justify the use of force unless there's a direct and immediate threat that could escalate. Similarly, gaining respect or teaching a lesson does not constitute a legitimate reason to use force, as these motives do not pertain to self-preservation or the protection of others in a life-threatening situation.